Daniel G. O’Day, Premier DUI Attorney, Advanced Level Training on Fighting The Lack Of Convergence Test

Daniel O'Day DUI, Daniel O'Day Attorney, Daniel O'Day DUI Attorney, Daniel O'Day Peoria IllinoisDaniel G. O’Day recently received advanced level training, from the American Association of Premier DUI Attorneys, on how to Fight The Lack Of Convergence Test. Daniel received training on the issues with the Lack of Convergence Test. Important issues include: the test may not be reliable because some people normally have the inability to cross their eyes, officers can produce an adverse outcome if they fail to let a person wear their glasses during the test, and officers can also produce an adverse outcome if they bring the stimulus in closer than 2 inches from the bridge of the nose.

The American Association of Premier DUI Attorneys has compiled information from Judges, Traffic Safety Resource Prosecutors (the Top DUI Prosecutors in each State), DUI Prosecutors, current Law Enforcement Officers, former Law Enforcement Officers, and DUI Defense Attorneys to determine exactly what skills, knowledge, training, tools, resources, and strategies win the most DUI cases at trial and are also used to get DUI cases successfully resolved for the defense prior to trial.

When people need a DUI Attorney, the biggest challenge is knowing whether or not an attorney truly has the skills, knowledge, training, tools, resources, and strategies that are needed to successfully resolve and win DUI cases. Countless attorneys handle DUI cases. But, only a very small percentage have the skills, knowledge, training, tools, resources, and strategies that are needed to successfully resolve and win DUI cases.

Members of the American Association of Premier DUI Attorneys have received advanced level training on the strategies that win the most DUI cases at trial and are also used to get DUI cases successfully resolved for the defense prior to trial. Members of the American Association of Premier DUI Attorneys also have access to the resources and tools that are used to win and successfully resolve DUI cases and these are resources and tools that only a very small percentage of DUI attorneys have access to and use.

 

Dan O’Day was born in Dubuque, IA in 1955 and moved to Peoria in 1959.  He worked at the A&W Root Beer stand in Peoria for 5 years and in data processing at Caterpillar in Peoria and East Peoria for 6 years before becoming a lawyer in 1981.  Professionally, Mr. O’Day previously practiced at the Chicago law firm of McDermott, Will & Emery and at the Peoria firm of Sutkowski & Washkuhn (now Sutkowski & Rhoads).  He joined our firm (known then as “Cusack & Fleming”) in 1990.

 

Dan O’Day is an honors graduate of Illinois Central College in East Peoria and Bradley University in Peoria.  He attended the University of Illinois College of Law in Champaign-Urbana, from which he graduated magna cum laude and in the top 10% of his law school class.  He was selected as a member of the Law Review, received the Rickert Award for Excellence in Legal Writing, and was Order of the Coif.

 

While in law school, Dan O’Day taught Business Law at the University of Illinois, College of Commerce.  There he was selected by the students as Most Outstanding Instructor.  In subsequent years he taught Business Law at Bradley University.  He has co-authored a three-volume legal treatise as well as articles published in various scholarly journals.

 

Dan O’Day is a trial lawyer.  He has tried hundreds of cases to verdict and/or judgment in State and Federal Courts.  His jury trials have included civil cases involving personal injuries, negligence, commercial fraud, commercial and real estate contract claims, employment claims, construction claims, specific performance, discrimination claims, replevin, insurance claims, and civil rights.  His jury trials have also included white collar criminal cases, primarily in Federal Courts, in the areas of mail fraud, tax fraud, wire fraud, bankruptcy fraud, bank fraud, insurance fraud, and securities fraud.  His trials before judges sitting without juries have involved numerous areas of law, including injunction cases.

 

Dan O’Day has also represented individuals and firms at over one hundred trial-like hearings before various administrative tribunals, including the Illinois Department of Professional Regulation, Illinois Department of Human Rights, USDA Packers & Stockyards Administration, Illinois Secretary of State Securities Division, Illinois Industrial Commission, Illinois Pollution Control Board, Illinois Department of Labor, Peoria County Election Commission, California Department of Labor, and various other levels and units of Federal, State, and local government. At well over thirty trial-like hearings in binding arbitration cases, Dan O’Day has represented a variety of parties including labor unions, construction firms, terminated employees, employers charged with unlawful termination, and terminated physicians.

 

Among his more interesting cases has been the recent representation of thousands of steel workers and retirees in their pursuit of hundreds of millions of dollars in claims in a Federal Bankruptcy Court. He once quickly and favorably settled a case for an Order of nuns operating a famed orphanage in Calcutta when they were sued in State Court in Peoria.  He collaborated in preparing affirmative defenses filed with the United States Senate on President Clinton’s behalf, contending that articles of impeachment approved in the House of Representatives were impermissibly multiplicitous and thus unconstitutional.

 

 

To learn more about Daniel G. O’Day, please visit http://www.peorialawfirm.com or http://www.aapda.org/directory/name/daniel-oday/

To learn more about the American Association of Premier DUI Attorneys, please visit http://www.aapda.org/

 

Information in this news release is the opinion of the American Association of Premier DUI Attorneys (AAPDA), and the use of the AAPDA logo, is the opinion of AAPDA that members have met AAPDA’s proprietary selection criteria. AAPDA does not guarantee or imply the competence level of any attorney, whether or not they are a member of AAPDA. When hiring an attorney, a person should personally contact the attorney and confirm the attorney’s skills, knowledge, training, tools, resources, strategies and other credentials. Any decision to hire an attorney should be based on a person’s satisfaction, after contacting the attorney, that the attorney hired is who they feel comfortable with and want to represent them. The specific outcome of each DUI case cannot be anticipated or guaranteed by AAPDA, or anyone else, as many factors can affect the outcome of each individual case.

American Association of Premier DUI Attorneys
PO Box 1055
Middleton, ID 83644

Daniel O'Day DUI, Daniel O'Day Attorney, Daniel O'Day DUI Attorney, Daniel O'Day Peoria Illinois

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*